Via the Rietveld Users' Mailing List
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:56:44 +0200 To: rietveld_l@ill.fr From: Robert Mauricot Dear all, I have a powder diffraction of an amorphous multiphase material. I want to do a quantitative analysis of the amorphous phase. Can anyone tell me what software does it. Sincery R.mauricot Cemes-CNRS Toulouse 31077 France Laboratoire NaNomat
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis From: "Jörg Bergmann" To: "rietveld_l@ill.fr" Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 17:39:08 +0200 (CEST) On Thu, 06 May 2004 16:56:44 +0200, Robert Mauricot wrote: >Dear all, > >I have a powder diffraction of an amorphous multiphase material. I want to >do a quantitative analysis of the amorphous phase. Can anyone tell me what >software does it. Many Rietveld programs will do so. For example, BGMN comes with an example for amorphous estimation, see http://www.bgmn.de/download.html -> http://www.bgmn.de/download/amorph.zip The principle is using an internal standard of known content. Sincery J"org Bergmann, Dresden email @ jbergmann.de *** This EComStation system uptime is 2 days 0 hours ***
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis From: Luca Lutterotti Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 19:55:07 +0200 To: rietveld_l@ill.fr Analysis without internal standard (for example for bulk materials) can be done with Maud for glasses of other common amorphous phases. http://www.ing.unitn.it/~luttero/maud there is one example, plus a publication on line. Luca Lutterotti
|
Subject: Quantitive analysis From: "Whitfield, Pamela" To: "'rietveld_l@ill.fr'" Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 13:44:36 -0400 Robert As previously mentioned many Rietveld programs will do what you want if you're willing to do the amorphous content calculations by hand afterwards. Some commercial software has it built in. I've done work in this area, and there are some pitfalls of which you must be aware, or your results may be VERY unreliable. 1. microabsorption. If your phases are similar in composition and your 'spike' phase has a similar absorption then this might not be a problem. However, there are instances in which extreme microabsorption can make a accurate determination practically impossible (other than possibly changing your tube to a more friendly wavelength). There is the Brindley correction that can sort of correct moderate microabsorption, but you need to know your particle size, and ideally it needs to have a narrow distribution. Reducing the particle size of your sample to sub-micron levels helps significantly. 2. spike phase. Many so-called crystalline phases aren't as fully crystalline as you might think. The SRM676 alumina had it's amorphous content measured a while back using neutrons and came out as 1.77 +- 0.68%. It doesn't sound alot but can make a big difference to your final results. Many 'crystalline' phases can be significantly higher. Microabsorption can be an issue with the spike so choose your spike carefully, and ideally standardise it using SRM676. Remember to include the error in the SRM676 amorphous content if quoting absolute amorphous contents rather than relative amounts. 3. particle statistics. This is equally as important when looking at purely crystalline materials, but errors due to poor particle statistics can really mess up amorphous content work. Ideally, micronise your sample before running it, but if they're nanomaterials then it might not be an issue. 4. surface roughness. I noticed that you probably work with nanomaterials. They tend to be fluffy, and such samples (at least on our instrument) show noticeable surface roughness effects on low angle reflections. If this is the case for your samples then you will either have to correct it or densify your sample somehow (or both). Some of this stuff was covered in the results of the quantitative analysis round robin a while back: Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 1a to 1h I. C. Madsen, N. V. Y. Scarlett, L. M. D. Cranswick and T. Lwin, J. Appl. Cryst. (2001). 34, 409-426 Outcomes of the International Union of Crystallography Commission on Powder Diffraction Round Robin on Quantitative Phase Analysis: samples 2, 3, 4, synthetic bauxite, natural granodiorite and pharmaceuticals N. V. Y. Scarlett, I. C. Madsen, L. M. D. Cranswick, T. Lwin, E. Groleau, G. Stephenson, M. Aylmore and N. Agron-Olshina J. Appl. Cryst. (2002). 35, 383-400 It would be useful to cross-check your technique on a couple of dummy samples if at all possible to make sure you're not being mislead. Have fun!! Pam Dr Pamela Whitfield CChem MRSC Energy Materials Group Institute for Chemical Process and Environmental Technology Building M12 National Research Council Canada 1200 Montreal Road Ottawa ON K1A 0R6 CANADA Tel: (613) 998 8462 Fax: (613) 991 2384 Email: mailto: pamela.whitfield @ nrc-cnrc.gc.ca ICPET WWW: http://icpet-itpce.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 15:43:19 -0400 To: rietveld_l@ill.fr From: Jim Cline Hi all, This is to say that I'm am nearly finished with the re-certification of SRM 676 for amorphous content. The revised certificate, offering a discussion as to the certification method, will be on the NIST website shortly, after the review process is completed. The certified phase purity of SRM 676 (retroactive to units in the field) is 91.75% +/- 1.5%. Regards, Jim James P. Cline jcline@nist.gov Ceramics Division Voice (301) 975 5793 National Institute of Standards and Technology FAX (301) 975 5334 100 Bureau Dr. stop 8520 Gaithersburg, MD 20899-8523 USA
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis From: "Whitfield, Pamela" To: "'rietveld_l@ill.fr'" Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 15:48:51 -0400 Jim Excellent news! This amorphous standard issue has been driving me nuts. When you say phase purity do you mean purity in terms of crystalline phase content? Pam Dr Pamela Whitfield CChem MRSC Energy Materials Group Institute for Chemical Process and Environmental Technology Building M12 National Research Council Canada 1200 Montreal Road Ottawa ON K1A 0R6 CANADA Tel: (613) 998 8462 Fax: (613) 991 2384 Email: mailto: pamela.whitfield @ nrc-cnrc.gc.ca ICPET WWW: http://icpet-itpce.nrc-cnrc.gc.ca
|
Date: Thu, 06 May 2004 16:18:09 -0400 To: rietveld_l@ill.fr From: Jim Cline
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis From: "Allen, Douglas" To: 'rietveld_l@ill.fr' Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 20:14:07 -0700 Speaking of internal standards. Can someone recommend a source of bulk alumina to use for production samples. I don't find 'linde A' listed in the Buehler catalog anymore. I'm not sure which of the various grades they list to order or if there is a better place to order it. Doug Allen Usually just lurking on this list
|
Subject: Re: Quantitive analysis Date: Fri, 7 May 2004 13:44:50 +1000 From: Ian Madsen To: rietveld_l@ill.fr Doug, We used commercially available alpha-Al2O3 (corundum) for the recent IUCr-CPD round robin on quantitative phase analysis. The source details are :- Bailalox alumina polishing powder Baikowski International Corporation Standard C 1.0 micron (scratch size - actual particle size approx 28micron) It is available in commercial quantities and from memory was not very expensive. Independent checks suggest it was better than 99% crystalline. For further details see the first round robin paper - Madsen et al. J.Appl Cryst (2001) 34, 409-426. Cheers o----------------------oo0oo---------------------------o Ian Madsen Science Adviser - Analytical Science CSIRO Minerals Box 312 Clayton South 3169 Victoria AUSTRALIA Phone +61 3 9545 8785 direct +61 3 9545 8500 switch 0417 554 935 mobile FAX +61 3 9562 8919 Email ian.madsen@csiro.au o----------------------oo0oo---------------------------o
|